Individual comment detail

Harris, Wendy
Date: Feb. 14, 2014
How will potential overlaps between the GPT terminal EIS process, and the county's updated EIS for the 2016 Comprehensive Plan update be coordinated?

The 2016 Comp. Plan should analyze Cherry Point, particularly since we have new information regarding the health of the herring, salmon and other wildlife, as well as recommendations to increase employment figures. Wetland analysis and off-site mitigation policies will be relevant to both review processes.

The potential for overlap and/or conflict exists. I assume that there will be different contractors working on each EIS analysis. What plans and procedures will be in place for coordination, and if there are none, how will inconsistencies or overlooked issues and information be handled?